A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, especially inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic concerns for instance environmental safety and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.